View Categories

Sample & Quotation Request Guide for Ink Systems & Formulation

TL;DR: The fastest way to get an accurate ink system quote is to submit a complete technical brief upfront — vague briefs generate placeholder pricing that can shift 15–30% once real specifications are confirmed.

TL;DR: Most sample iterations happen because buyers don’t specify substrate type and surface treatment — on our production line, switching from untreated BOPP to corona-treated BOPP changes ink adhesion pass/fail outcomes in 100% of tape tests.

What Symptoms in Your Current Ink Quote Process Are Costing You Sample Rounds #

When buyers come to us with a new ink system requirement, the briefs we receive fall into roughly three categories: complete, partial, and “I’ll send more details later.” Partial and deferred briefs are the direct cause of at least 60% of the sample iterations we log under our QC-07 resampling tracker each quarter. Recognising the symptoms early saves two to four weeks.

Here are the observable failure patterns and their most likely root causes:

Symptom at Quote Stage Likely Root Cause Consequence
Quoted price changes after sample review Substrate spec not confirmed upfront Requote adds 7–14 working days
Colour on sample differs from artwork reference No Pantone code or Delta-E tolerance provided 2–3 proof iterations before approval
Adhesion failure on first sample Surface treatment level missing from brief Full reformulation required; resampling cycle restarts
Supplier asks for “more details” after RFQ submission Quantity tiers not specified; no minimum run stated Quote remains provisional, cannot be compared fairly
Sample smells off or fails migration screen Application end-use (food-adjacent, direct contact) not declared Compliance reformulation; potential regulatory delay

A brief that causes any of the above isn’t a communication problem. It’s a specification gap that our formulation team cannot bridge without your input.

The Root Cause Most Teams Misdiagnose: Substrate Surface Energy, Not Ink Colour #

When a printed sample comes back looking “wrong,” the default assumption is that the ink colour was mixed incorrectly. In roughly two-thirds of the cases we see, the colour is fine. The adhesion is not.

Surface energy is measured in millinewtons per metre (mN/m). For ink to wet out and bond to a plastic film substrate, the substrate’s surface energy must exceed the ink’s surface tension by at least 6–8 mN/m. Untreated polyethylene typically reads 31–34 mN/m. Untreated BOPP sits at 29–32 mN/m. Standard water-based flexo inks have surface tensions in the 28–34 mN/m range. At that overlap, adhesion is marginal at best and will fail a 180° peel test per ASTM D903 under any meaningful load.

Corona treatment raises surface energy to 38–44 mN/m on BOPP, and that 10+ mN/m gap is what creates reliable adhesion. But corona treatment degrades. A film treated at the film manufacturer and then stored for six weeks can drop back to 36 mN/m or lower, depending on humidity and how it was wound. By the time the reel arrives on our press, the effective surface energy may or may not be above threshold.

The confirmation method is a simple dyne test using calibrated dyne pens (or dyne solution per ISO 8296) applied at the press feed. We run this test on every incoming flexible film reel as part of our incoming inspection protocol. If dyne level reads below 38 mN/m, the reel goes on hold. If a buyer’s brief says “BOPP, unspecified treatment,” we cannot predict which outcome the material lot will produce — so our sample is essentially a guess until the actual production reel is tested.

The measurement is fast, takes under 60 seconds per reel, and costs nothing beyond the dyne pens. But without the substrate spec in the brief, we can’t call out the risk before the sample is made.

Corrective Actions, Ranked by Impact on Getting an Accurate First Sample #

  1. Specify substrate by grade, treatment, and thickness. For film substrates, include: film type (BOPP, CPP, PE, PET), treatment status (corona/untreated/metallised), gauge in microns (common flexo film runs 12–25 µm for inner layers, 30–60 µm for surface print). This single change eliminates the most common resampling trigger. Applies to both flexo and gravure ink briefs.

  2. Provide a Pantone reference or Lab colour target with Delta-E tolerance. If you need colour matched to an existing product, specify the allowable Delta-E. For premium consumer goods, Delta-E ≤ 1.5 is the right threshold. For standard commercial printing, Delta-E ≤ 3.0 is typical. Without this number, “match our brand blue” requires at least two proof iterations regardless of how experienced the formulator is.

  3. Declare the end-use application and any compliance requirements. If packaging is food-adjacent (e.g., outer wrap, not direct contact), state that explicitly. If FDA 21 CFR Part 175 or EU 10/2011 migration limits apply, we need to select low-migration photoinitiators and resins from the qualified list before sampling, not after. This step cannot be added retroactively without reformulation.

  4. Request a white sample before a printed proof. For structural formats (pouches, sleeves, labels), a white sample (unprinted, correct construction and material) lets you confirm dimensional fit, peel force, and substrate compatibility before spending budget on colour-accurate proofs. Printed proofs cost 3–5× more to produce than white samples; confirming structure first keeps total sampling cost down.

  5. Submit quantity tiers at RFQ stage. Ink system pricing depends heavily on batch size. A 25 kg ink batch for a 20,000-unit trial run prices differently from a 200 kg batch for a 200,000-unit production order. If you submit only one quantity, our quote will carry a caveat that pricing could change by 10–20% at a different volume. Give us three tiers — your trial quantity, your standard reorder, and your peak order — and we can lock pricing on all three in the initial quote.

Prevention: What to Put in the Brief Before You Request a Quote #

For ink system quotations, the spec sheet we need before our formulation team can issue a firm price covers: substrate identity (type, grade, treatment, gauge), print process (flexo/gravure/offset), number of colours and whether white is a base layer, desired finish (gloss/matte/tactile), end-use compliance tier (standard/food-adjacent/direct food contact), artwork file in CMYK-separated PDF with 3 mm bleed and Pantone call-outs, and your Delta-E acceptance threshold.

The single brief gap that triggers the most resampling iterations is missing the compliance tier. Brands often assume that food-adjacent packaging doesn’t require low-migration ink, but if outer packaging contacts unpackaged food even briefly in a retail environment, retailers in the EU may require compliance with EU 10/2011 limits on primary migrants.

Request our Ink Brief Template (form ref: IBT-04) at the start of any new project. It takes 20 minutes to complete and eliminates the back-and-forth that typically adds 10–15 working days to a first-sample cycle.

Specification Notes for Brand Partners #

When you brief us on an ink system requirement, the most useful information arrives in this order: substrate confirmed, process confirmed, compliance tier declared, colour targets specified. That sequence lets us assign the correct ink family before any other work begins.

The gap we see most often in new briefs is an unspecified lamination structure. If the ink layer will sit between two films in a laminate, the ink must withstand the lamination adhesive chemistry — and if solvent-based adhesive is used, the ink must be solvent-resistant. We’ve had briefs where this wasn’t flagged, and the laminated sample showed ink bleed at the bond line. Specifying the full layer structure (print / adhesive type / laminate film) upfront avoids this entirely.

Our standard sampling timeline for ink formulation and a printed proof is 12–15 working days from confirmed brief. Complex compliance formulations (low-migration UV, food-direct water-based systems) run 18–22 working days due to migration screening. Timeline resets to day one if the substrate changes after sampling begins — which is the main reason to confirm substrate before issuing a sample order.

What artwork file format do you need for an ink formulation and proof request?

PDF/X-1a or PDF/X-4, CMYK-separated, with all Pantone colours called out by PMS number. Minimum 300 dpi at final print size, with 3 mm bleed on all live edges. RGB files require colour conversion on our end, which introduces colour shift — a Delta-E difference of 2.0–4.0 is common in RGB-to-CMYK conversion without a calibrated ICC profile provided by the client.

How many sample stages should I budget for before production approval?

For a straightforward brief with substrate and compliance tier confirmed upfront: white sample (5–7 working days), printed colour proof (7–10 working days), and production sample (tied to first production run). That’s three stages. Where we see four or five stages is typically when the substrate is changed after proofing begins, or when compliance requirements are added mid-process.

Can I compare quotes from two suppliers using different ink systems?

Yes, but compare on total cost per thousand units, not ink cost per kilogram. A high-solid water-based ink at a higher kg price may require less laydown per square metre than a lower-solid system, which changes the per-unit cost significantly. Ask both suppliers to quote on identical ink laydown figures (in g/m²) if you want a valid comparison. Without a common laydown spec, kg price comparisons are not reliable.

Does the print process affect how I brief the ink specification?

The ink viscosity range for flexo runs 15–25 seconds (Zahn cup #3), while gravure inks run 12–18 seconds — and offset inks are specified by tack value (typically 10–16 on the Inkometer scale) rather than viscosity. These are not interchangeable specifications. If you’re moving a job from gravure to flexo, the ink system needs to be reformulated from the base resin up, not simply diluted. State the print process clearly in the brief, and if you’re evaluating a process change, flag it as a separate qualification step.

What Delta-E tolerance should I specify for brand colour matching?

It depends on the packaging end-use and retail channel. Premium beauty and luxury goods: Delta-E ≤ 1.5 against a confirmed physical standard. Standard FMCG retail: Delta-E ≤ 3.0 is commercially acceptable. For colour that will appear across multiple packaging formats (carton, pouch, label), align all suppliers to the same physical colour standard — digital references alone will drift between substrates. If you don’t specify a tolerance, we default to Delta-E ≤ 2.0 under D50 illuminant per ISO 13655.


Planning a packaging project? Contact our team to request a complimentary specification review and sample quote.

9 条评论

  1. The adhesion failure point hits close — we had a supplier in Guangzhou send three rounds of ink samples on what we thought was the same BOPP substrate, turned out their test film was 38-dyne corona treated and our production reels were running at 42 dyne. Nobody asked, nobody told. Resampling cycle ran 6 weeks before someone thought to put a dyne pen on the actual production roll.

  2. The adhesion row hits close — we had a reformulation restart last quarter on a water-based flexo ink for a recycled kraft mailer because the brief didn’t flag that the liner had been cold-seal treated, and the supplier’s first two samples were already in transit before anyone caught it. Six weeks gone.

  3. The corona treatment point is real — we ran into this on our 200ml gin pouch labels last year, switching from untreated to 44 dyne/cm treated BOPP mid-production run. The reformulation cycle added about $0.23/unit in rework and resampling costs across a 15k label order, which didn’t sound catastrophic until we factored in the four-week delay against a seasonal launch window.

  4. The migration failure row is the one I wish I’d read two years ago. We had a UV-flexo varnish on a rigid box insert for a fragrance gift set — nothing food-adjacent, or so the brief said, until QA flagged that the insert was sitting directly against a complimentary lip balm sachet during transit. The varnish hadn’t been screened against ISEGA or any direct cosmetic contact standard, and the migration test we ran post-complaint showed transfer above threshold onto the sachet film. Reformulation, re-approval, and a six-week delay on a Q4 launch window.

  5. The colour deviation row is worth flagging an exception on — Delta-E tolerance alone isn’t always enough if you’re printing on metallised substrates, because the substrate luminosity shifts perceived hue even when your Delta-E 2000 reading is within a 2.0 pass threshold. We specify substrate-referenced colour targets separately from our flat white stock targets for exactly this reason, and it added a step to our brief template but killed the third proof iteration almost entirely on our foil-laminate praline boxes.

  6. Always include your minimum run quantity and your top three volume tiers in the initial RFQ, not as a follow-up — we had a solvent-based gravure ink quoted at one price for 500kg runs, then watched it reprice twice once the supplier figured out we were actually ordering 50kg batches for seasonal SKUs.

  7. The “supplier asks for more details” row is the one that quietly kills schedules — we had a water-based lamination ink RFQ sit provisional for 19 working days because we hadn’t confirmed whether the run quantity was 200kg or 800kg, and the supplier couldn’t finalise solvent loading or pigment ratios until we did.

  8. The colour iteration row is the one that still surprises buyers — we’ve had Delta-E tolerances set as loose as 5.0 on a premium single-origin tea sachet range, and even at that tolerance we burned through four proof rounds because the Pantone 7503 C reference was being matched against an uncoated stock swatch while we were printing on a calendered glassine. Substrate optical brightness alone shifted the perceived warmth enough to fail every round until someone flagged the swatch mismatch.

  9. The “quoted price changes after sample review” row is the one I keep having to explain to procurement. We had a rotogravure ink system for a foil-laminated caddy quoted at one rate, then re-priced after sample stage when we finally confirmed the substrate was 12µm PET not OPP — six working days lost just on the requote.

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注